The long-awaited report into alleged Russian “interference” in British national life was finally released today after the government caved into public pressure.
The report’s key finding is that the British intelligence community took their “eye off the ball” over alleged Russian interference in the UK’s national life and more broadly the government has “badly underestimated” the alleged threat.
The report has been released by the House of Commons’ Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) after the government finally gave the green light following months of delays and stonewalling.
The main highlights of the 47-page report - key parts of which have been censored or redacted - include:
In his immediate response to the ISC report, foreign secretary Dominic Raab, refused to be drawn on details and simply said: “We will be resolute in defending our country, our democracy and our values from such hostile state activity”.
Meanwhile, shadow foreign secretary, Lisa Nandy, tweeted that the government should “study the conclusions of the report carefully and take the necessary steps to keep our country safe”.
The publication of the report is widely judged to be an embarrassment to the government even though it does not contain any bombshells on links between the ruling Conservative Party and Russian oligarchs living in Britain.
Furthermore, the government is not in an ideal position to deal with the security, political and financial threats outlined by the ISC, not least because its relationship with the newly-elected head of the ISC is far from ideal.
The dissident Tory MP, Julian Lewis, was elected to chair the ISC on July 15 but had the Conservative whip removed from him barely hours after he took over the leadership of the powerful committee.
Lewis is known to take an independent view on foreign policy issues and rarely toes the government line when he is in disagreement with it. Most famously Lewis was consistently opposed to British military intervention in the long-running Syrian conflict.