Netanyahu forced to accept truce deal he had rejected after 67 days of resistance: Analyst

US Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) talks with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during a rally with fellow Democrats before voting on H.R. 1, or the People Act, on the East Steps of the US Capitol on March 08, 2019 in Washington, DC. (AFP photo)


By Press TV Website Staff

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was forced to concede and accept the ceasefire deal after 67 days of unprecedented and high-intensity resistance by Hezbollah, says a Lebanese commentator.

In a conversation with the Press TV website, Hussein Chokr, a policy researcher and international affairs analyst based in Beirut, said if Netanyahu and his regime were truly winning, as he claimed, he would not abandon his goals and ambitions in the middle of the high-intensity war.

Netanyahu announced a truce deal with the Lebanese resistance movement late on Tuesday, which was confirmed by the Lebanese government as well as the United States and France on Wednesday.

The “permanent” truce calls for the immediate cessation of Israeli aggression against the Arab country.

Chokr said the day Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah was assassinated in late September in Beirut, Netanyahu declared that he aimed to “change the strategic security dynamics of the region, starting with altering the security context on the Lebanese front.”

“However, after 67 days of unprecedented, high-intensity resistance, he was compelled to accept a deal that he had firmly rejected in the early days of the war,” he told the Press TV website.

Chokr, who works as a policy researcher at the American University of Beirut (AUB) and previously worked as a governance researcher with The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (UNESCWA), said the resistance achieved its objectives in this war of attrition.

“Netanyahu himself acknowledged that one of the reasons for accepting the deal was to give the Israeli army time to recuperate and manage its ammunition inventory and this is literally a result of attrition,” he noted, referring to the embattled Israeli premier’s speech on Tuesday night.

“Additionally, it’s clear that he sought the deal to ease the pressure on the internal front as more Israelis were displaced, and the residents of northern Israel increased their demands for action.”

Most significantly, Chokr hastened to add that Netanyahu failed to stop Hezbollah rockets from reaching occupied Haifa and central occupied Palestinian territories, contrary to his claims of having destroyed the Lebanese resistance's rocket capabilities.

Importantly, Hezbollah has carried out a significant number of sophisticated military operations in recent weeks, penetrating deep inside the occupied territories, including high-value military targets.

On Monday, the resistance group carried out a record 51 military operations, including high-precision attacks on key Israeli military facilities in Tel Aviv and Haifa.

“This was the main factor, among others, that pressured the war cabinet into pursuing a ceasefire deal. The high-intensity resistance thwarted Israel's attempts to ease the pressures it had endured over the course of 11 months. They sought a final and decisive solution to the displacement of northern settlers through military force by altering the security context in southern Lebanon, but they failed,” Shokr said.

In the “brutal and unprecedented” ground battles that continued for nearly 70 days, the Lebanese analyst said the Israeli regime not only failed to halt the rocket fire by the Lebanese resistance but also failed to capture the strategic town of Khiam, 4.5 kilometers from Metula.

“Al-Khiam had been subjected to relentless airstrikes, bombardments, and air surveillance for 14 consecutive months. Despite their stated objective of neutralizing the resistance's power south of the Litani River, they failed to advance more than 3 kilometers into Lebanese territory,” he told the Press TV website.

On the narrative being pushed by Western analysts that the Gaza front has been delinked from the Lebanese front following the latest ceasefire, Shokr said it primarily aims to “create fractures and sow divisions among the allies of the Axis of Resistance, particularly Hezbollah, Hamas, and Islamic Jihad.”

“The response of the resistance groups in Gaza is focused on preventing this rift, recognizing the sacrifices Lebanon has made to support Gaza,” he stated.

“How can one speak of abandonment when Lebanon has endured so much—thousands of martyrs, tens of thousands of injured, and the destruction of tens of thousands of homes and businesses.”


Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:

www.presstv.ir

www.presstv.co.uk

SHARE THIS ARTICLE