UK halts ICC Netanyahu arrest warrant challenge
Never before in the history of the International Criminal Court have so many countries tried to block arrest warrants for people suspected of war crimes.
Not long after ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan requested arrest warrants for Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu and his minister of military affairs, Yoav Gallant, the UK, Germany, the US and others, joined forces to try and scupper or delay the warrants.
Others such as Norway, Spain and South Africa came out in favor of the ICC ruling.
However, in a reversal of plans announced by the former British Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, and under mounting public pressure, the UK's new Labour government has said it is pulling out of the process.
While welcomed as a step in the right direction, it was blasted by Israel lobby groups such as the board of Deputies of British Jews, who expressed concern about its cumulative effect on Israel.
The core tenet of the US led legal challenge is that the ICC has no jurisdiction to prosecute Israeli leaders, an argument international law experts call tenuous at best.
Palestine has jurisdiction and can bring that claim because it is a party to the ICC and the Rome Statute.
Now, one legal principle to note, and which is a principle that Israel may use, is to say, well, we can investigate the crimes, because ICC has what is known as complementary jurisdiction.
It allows a country to investigate its crimes, but it is highly unlikely, as we've seen in the last year, for Israel to hold its own politicians and warmongers accountable.
Dr Imranali Panjwani, Lawyer and Academic
Dr Panjwani believes the arrest warrants will be issued a few months later than expected.
The same court took only a month to issue an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin; not a single country intervened.
Well that's a piece of string.
Could be one month, could be several months, so I think it will occur.
But it may take time, because it is not in the political interests of the major players, or, as it was, in the political interests of the US to have an arrest warrant issued for Vladimir Putin.
Dr Imranali Panjwani, Lawyer and Academic
He also believes the decision to allow 64 interventions shows how politically sensitive the case is.
The ICC has long been accused of being a colonial court focusing only on African war criminals, but with the case against Netanyahu, the court is sending a message that no one is above the law.
Now that the UK has dropped its legal challenge against those arrest warrants, Palestinian rights activists are hoping that it will support the ICJ and ICC rulings and as immediate first steps, imposes an arms embargo on Tel Aviv and a ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements.
US Black Friday protests
South Africa's anti-Apartheid effort to isolate Israel
Western media's hall of shame with pro-Israeli bias
US imposes new sanctions on fleet involved in Iran’s oil exports
Iran ready to consider troop deployment to Syria upon official request
VIDEO | Press TV's news headlines
23 Palestinians killed in Gaza as Israel issues new evacuation threats
Gazans now face epidemic of traumatic injuries: UNRWA
South Korea’s President Yoon declares martial law
Yemen, Iraqi resistance strike Israeli targets in joint operations
France’s Barnier government inches closer to collapse
PressTV NEWSLETTER
now
This makes it easy to access the Press TV website
