News   /   Society

Arctic drilling not worth the risk, Clinton says

EXETER, NH - AUGUST 10: Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton prepares to take questions from reporters following a town hall meeting at Exeter High School August 10, 2015 in Exeter, New Hampshire. (photos by AFP)

US Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has expressed opposition to the Obama administration’s approval of drilling in the Arctic, saying the move is not “worth the risk.’

“The Arctic is a unique treasure. Given what we know, it's not worth the risk of drilling,” said the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination in a Tuesday tweet, one day after the administration of President Barack Obama gave Royal Dutch Shell permission to start drilling in the oil-rich Chukchi Sea off northern Alaska.

A Harvest Northern Fulmar flies near the Nordenskjoldbreen glacier in the Spitbergen province of the Svalbard archipelago, in the Arctic Ocean on July 19, 2015.

The move has outraged environmentalist groups, given the vulnerability of the region, which is being strongly hit global warming.

Among other GOP members, Republican National Committee spokesman Michael Short denounced Clinton’s tweet, calling Arctic drilling “yet another job-creating energy project.”

“Once again, Hillary Clinton is reminding voters she’ll say or do anything to get elected,” read a statement.

Greenpeace US executive director Annie Leonard also responded to the tweet saying, “Hillary Clinton got it right on the Arctic,”

Shell, which has so far spent $7 billion in its search for oil, stopped drilling there in 2012 due to a series of incidents its operations caused.

In this December 30, 2014 file photo, the Shell logo is seen in Falls Church, Virginia.

The Anglo–Dutch multinational oil and gas company was initially granted permission during the administration of former President George W. Bush to start drilling in Arctic, which holds 20 percent of undiscovered oil and gas on the globe.

Ben Van Beurden, (R) Chief Executive Officer of Royal Dutch Shell, and Simon Henry, Chief Financial Officer of Royal Dutch Shell, address a press conference in central London on July 30, 2015.

 

Obama’s inverse move

In a dissimilar pro-environmental move on Tuesday, the Obama administration took measures to limit emissions to up to 45 percent in the next decade.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed new rules aimed at reducing potent greenhouse gas methane in the oil and gas sector.

Emissions spew out of a large stack at the coal-fired Morgantown Generating Station June 29, 2015 in Newburg, Maryland. 

The move is part of a strategy announced by Obama earlier this month,

“We do project that our proposal will achieve significant reductions to benefit the climate and public health on the way to meeting that goal,” said Janet McCabe, the EPA’s point person on clean air policies.

Activists have hailed the moved while the oil and gas industry as well as many Republican politicians have opposed it.

“We only get one home. We only get one planet. There is no plan B,” Obama said on August 3 after unveiling the plan, which is part of an international push to save the planet.


Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:

www.presstv.co.uk

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Press TV News Roku